Home >Camera Enforcement > Red Light Cameras > San Diego Smoking Gun Documents

Related News New Mexico Bans Traffic Cameras From State Roads California: Red Light Camera Refunds Reach $3.1 Million Florida: Red Light Camera Lobbyist Fails To Register Louisiana Lawmaker Proposes Local Votes For All Traffic Camera Programs Washington: Federal Judge Saves State Camera Program View Main Topics: Camera Enforcement    Speed Cameras    Red Light Cameras    Revenue from Cameras    Camera Accuracy    Engineering/Signals Police Enforcement    Random Checkpoints    Speed Limits/Traps    Tickets and Cash    Seizure/Confiscation    Parking Tickets    Taxes and Tolls    Drunk Driving Laws Miscellaneous Issues    Miscellaneous    Hypocrisy    Bad Policy and Injustice    Propaganda    New Technologies    Privacy Issues The Revolt    Protests    Camera Destruction Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail Back To Front Page

12/1/2004 San Diego Smoking Gun Documents Documents from San Diego that prove cameras were deliberately placed at short-timed intersections. These seven pages offer proof that cities and private red light camera operators have exploited the use of photo enforcement at intersections with short yellow signal time. In 2001, the Red Light Camera Defense Team subpoenaed the documents found at the source link below during their landmark and successful court trial in San Diego, California. The final page in the set is marked at the bottom, "Lockheed Martin IMS: Confidential" to indicate that those involved did not want the material disclosed. Lockheed later sold its photo ticketing division to Affiliated Computer Services (ACS). The documents first show a list of intersections where red light cameras were placed. Next, they show the intersections with the highest accident rates. Because the lists do not match, it is clear that cameras were not placed at dangerous intersections. So where were they placed? Page 4 shows the list which includes "high volume", "downhill" and "Amber (yellow) phase less than 4 seconds." Although other criteria such as accident rate are listed, it is clear that the company did not actually use accident history in making its decision. Pages 6-7 show the actual criteria they used for specific intersections, and it has everything to do with short yellows and volume. In other words, the criteria used were those most likely to produce maximum monetary return, not any safety benefit. The full set of documents is available in a 530k PDF file at the source link below. Source: San Diego Documents (City of San Diego, 12/1/2001) Regional News: Other news about San Diego, California Permanent Link for this item Return to Front Page

Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Achive | Search | theNewspaper.com: A journal of the politics of driving