|Home >Police Enforcement > Taxes and Tolls > Presidential Candidates Endorse Toll Road Bank|
Tolling Interstate 95 In Virginia, North Carolina Hits Roadblock
Maine: Legislation Would Reverse Toll Road Secrecy
Australia: Another Toll Road Goes Bankrupt
Lawmakers Seek To Eliminate Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
California: Toll Roads Generate $1.7 Billion In Red Ink
View Main Topics:
Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail
Back To Front Page
3/26/2008Presidential Candidates Endorse Toll Road Bank
Democratic presidential candidates endorse $60 billion federal bureaucracy charged with funding new toll road projects.
Taking a page from the New Deal, Senators Hillary Clinton (D-New York) and Barack Obama (D-Illinois) have signed on to a measure that would create a public-private partnership agency tasked with expanding the role of the federal government in creating massive public works projects. As cosponsors of legislation introduced by Senator Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut), himself a former presidential candidate, the senators would create a National Infrastructure Bank to fund large federal projects with "a preference for projects which leverage private financing, including public-private partnerships." In other words, toll roads.
By its charter, the proposed bank would administer direct subsidies and issue bonds with terms of up to fifty years to promote mass transit, public housing, toll roads and toll bridges or wastewater treatment systems. The bank would encourage local public agencies to "partner" with private for-profit entities to develop these massive projects which must be worth at least $75 million each to qualify for funding.
"The bank does not displace existing formula grants and earmarks for infrastructure," Senator Dodd explained. "It targets specifically large capacity-building projects that are not adequately served by current financing mechanisms. The proposed Infrastructure Bank Act also will increase the ability of the private sector to play a central role in infrastructure provision."
The idea for the bank was first proposed by the Center for Strategic and International Studies Commission on Public Infrastructure. In a 2006 report, the group cited the London Mayor Ken Livingstone's congestion tax as a prime example of the successful execution of an infrastructure concept.
"Technology creates new opportunities for project design, capacity expansion, user cost recovery, and peak-load management," the CSIS report explained "For example, advanced video and computer technology support congestion pricing systems that have reduced automobile traffic in London by a third."
The US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs held a hearing to promote the legislation on March 11. Representatives from CSIS, the American Society of Civil Engineers, Goldman Sachs and the AFL-CIO all testified in favor of the idea. A copy of the prosed legislation is available in a 90k PDF file at the source link below.
Source: S. 1926 (Congress of the United States, 8/1/2007)
Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page
Front Page | Get Updates |
Site Map |
News Archive |
theNewspaper.com: A journal of the politics of driving